Sunday, April 19, 2009

Vote for your favourite pizza using STV and FPTP

You have the right to vote for your favourite types of pizzas among the selections that I have chosen. Click the link above to vote using the Single Transferable Vote (STV). Click the polls to the right to vote using First-Past-the-Post (FPTP). On May 12, you and your friends will be able to enjoy three imaginary pizzas as chosen by the people taking these polls. For the STV rank order poll, there are three political parties with three candidates each and one independent. The three political parties are the Meat Lovers, Vegetarian, and Cheese Plus. In the FPTP polls, each party has one candidate. The independent candidate is running in one of the Pizza Order ridings.

Vote for your favourite pizza parliament using STV and/or FPTP. Three imaginary pizzas will be offered based on the results for STV and FPTP.

Vote for your favourite toppings!

Skinny Dipper

PS: You may pick off the imaginary toppings if you wish after you receive your pizzas.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Try BC-STV voting online

Chrystal Ocean from Challenging the Commonplace posted a link to an amazing website that lets people vote in a British Columbia provincial election using the Single Transferable Vote system. It's easy to use. Just go Try BC-STV, click a riding, and rank your candidates from first preference to last. Once you submit your choices, the results are tabulated showing how others voted in that particular BC-STV riding and the candidates that would get elected.

Go to Try BC-STV. Have fun and tell your friends about the website and BC-STV!

H/T: Challenging the Commonplace

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Who is the better actor and singer? Billy Bob Thornton vs. SpongeBob Squarepants?

I have two polls on the right side of my blog. The first is "Who is a better actor?" Billy Bob Thornton or SpongeBob Squarepants? The second poll is "Who is a better singer?" Billy Bob Thornton or SpongeBob Squarepants?

Take the polls to your right and leave comments below.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Parental demographic reform in public schools. No ESL students please!

H/T: Peterborough Politics

The Ministry of Education in Ontario is posting demographic information about students attending publicly funded schools in Ontario.

Don't think that parents don't use this demographic information in deciding which schools their children should attend.

[My edited comment posted on Peterborough Politics]:

Here's an excellent article on how parents use statistics to get their children into certain public schools in Toronto:

Parts of Toronto Life article:

"While the public education system is usually touted as the great equalizer, many neighbourhoods have a Jackman-type [public] school, with better amenities and better test scores than the others in the area. Often, those schools are closed to kids who live out of district. As the troubled schools in this city get more troubled, and the schools with the best scores generate better reputations, parents feel more pressure than ever to give their kids the best the public system has to offer. They’ll lie, cheat and go into extreme real estate debt to make it happen."

...

"'There’s a large ESL component there,' says one father of two who lives in Chester’s catchment. 'There seems to be a lot of Yugoslavians. We spent some time in the schoolyard but couldn’t real­ly relate to the other parents, and we didn’t want to put our kids in that situation.' They enrolled their kids in Frankland, a school similar to Jackman in demographics and test scores. 'We’re not prejudiced. We just didn’t feel comfortable, and people don’t go to schools where they’re uncomfortable.' Jill Worthy, the TDSB superintendent for most of the schools in the Danforth and Riverdale area, said much the same thing: 'What some parents want is a more homogeneous environment, a less multicultural situation. They fear their children will be a minority within a school’s majority culture.'

I will add also that parent councils at different schools raise various levels of funds.

Update: Information about two different schools: #1 & #2.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Doha Debates: Time to get tough on Israel--play by play action

Debate held at Georgetown University

Motion: This House believes it's time for the US administration to get tough on Israel.

Michael Scheuer, founder and former head of the CIA's Bin Laden tracking unit, supported the motion by mentioning that the new [Obama] administration needs to break ties with both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. No nation as a right to exist. Israel is the most arrogant and treacherous of US allies. He also commented that democracy building is a silly foreign policy goal that the US should not be pursuing. Countries have a right to defend themselves; they don't have a right to exist.

Dore Gold, a former Israeli ambassador to the UN, spoke against the motion. He mentioned that one should not assume that radical organizations will disappear should the US choose to get tough with Israel. The US needs to smartly support Israel. The biggest threat comes from Iran.

Avraham Burg, former speaker of the Israeli Knesset and a senior member of the Labour Party, also spoke in favour of the motion. The US must get tougher with Israel, but not indifferent. He commented that the relationship between the US and Israel is like a parent who doesn't know how to say no to a child.

Alan Dershowitz, the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, also spoke against the motion. He said that the US should not single out Israel as this will weaken Israel's security. He supported US engagement with Syria, Iran, and Hamas. Mr. Dershowitz did recognize that Arabs in Israel do face discrimination. However, they are better treated than Arabs anywhere in the world.

During the question and answer session, after Mr. Gold mentioned that he was not for the 1967 boundaries should there be negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians, Mr. Berg rebutted on why the Palestinians would not be willing to come forward. Mr. Gold replied that the demographics have changed in the West Bank.

Mr. Scheuer argued that both Messrs. Dershowitz and Gold are arguing for the status-quo. He also said that the US is under threat by others in the world by supporting Israel.

Mr. Gold quoted an editor-in-chief of a London based Arabic newspaper that the biggest threat to Saudi Arabia and the Middle East region comes from Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons(--not Israel).

A Canadian student, Kelly Spitz from Toronto, asked a question about the US needing to improve its international reputation. Both Dershowitz and Gold mentioned that voters in western democracies have elected pro-Israeli governments. Mr. Gold boldly declared, "And the Prime Minister of Canada is the strongest supporter of Israel in the world!"

Mr. Scheuer said that the US should make them grow up by stopping support for Israel. The US has no business building democracies around the world.

Hopefully, the Doha Debates will have video (March 25, 2009) on its website.

Update: Doha Debates on BBC World: Time to get tought on Israel

Update: re-broadcast of Doha Debates on BBC World airing at 11:10 a.m. Eastern and 3:10 p.m.

More info:

http://skinnydips.blogspot.com/2009/04/doha-debates-time-to-get-tough-on.html

Saturday, April 4, 2009

The Doha Debates: Time to get tough on Israel

Update: re-broadcast of Doha Debates on BBC World airing at 11:10 a.m. Eastern and 3:10 p.m.

The Doha Debates (Don't click the Doha Debates link if you do not wish to view the results of the motion.)

Motion: This House believes it's time for the US administration to get tough on Israel.

I encourage everyone interested in the Middle East to watch this debate. It airs on BBC World on Sunday at 3:10 a.m. Eastern Time, 11:10 a.m., and 3:10 p.m.

The Doha Debates, a forum for dialogue and free speech in Qatar, took place in Gaston Hall last night for a discussion entitled “This House believes it’s time for the U.S. administration to get tough on Israel.”

In its first event in the United States since its founding in 2004, moderator Tim Sebastian, founder and chairman of the Doha Debates, was joined by Avraham Burg, former speaker of the Israeli Knesset and senior member of the Labor Party, and Michael Scheuer, former head of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Bin Laden Issue Station, affirming. Dore Gold, former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations and current president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, and Alan Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, spoke against the motion.

The Hoya (Spoiler alert!)